The nuclear threat between India and Pakistan has long cast a shadow over South Asia, especially during periods of military escalation. But how real is the possibility of nuclear war? While history shows several flashpoints, experts maintain that the actual risk remains low—yet never zero.
The Nuclear Standoff: History and Posturing
Pakistan’s Red Lines
Since acquiring nuclear capabilities, Pakistan has never articulated a formal nuclear doctrine like India’s “No First Use” policy. However, clues to its nuclear posture are evident. In 2001, Khalid Kidwai—then head of Pakistan’s Strategic Plans Division—outlined four red lines that could trigger nuclear retaliation:
- Major territorial loss
- Destruction of key military assets
- Economic strangulation
- Political destabilization
During the 1999 Kargil War, Pakistan’s foreign secretary said the country wouldn’t “hesitate to use any weapon” to defend itself. This veiled threat drew international concern.
India’s Strategic Response
India’s nuclear doctrine emphasizes credible minimum deterrence and No First Use—though this stance has been debated internally, especially post-2016 surgical strikes and the 2019 Balakot airstrikes.
Key Flashpoints That Raised Alarms
- 1999 Kargil Conflict: U.S. intelligence reportedly suggested Pakistan was readying nuclear warheads.
- 2001 Parliament Attack and 2002 Military Standoff: The region saw massive mobilizations and brinkmanship.
- Pulwama-Balakot (2019): Former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed he was woken up to a potential nuclear escalation during the standoff. However, diplomats from both sides later downplayed the immediacy of any nuclear move.
- March 2022 Missile Incident: India accidentally launched a nuclear-capable missile into Pakistan. Though no casualties occurred, the lack of communication highlighted how errors could trigger unintended conflict.
Expert Analysis: What Keeps the Lid On?
Experts widely agree that strategic deterrence has held—but this does not mean danger is absent.
“So long as there is not major ground combat along the border, the dangers of nuclear use remain relatively small and manageable,” says nuclear scholar Mr. Clary.
Yet, accidents, misinformation, and human error are wildcards.
“Hackers, computer failures, or unstable leadership could cause escalation,” warns Prof. Alan Robock, Rutgers University.
Nuclear Capabilities as of 2025
| Country | Estimated Warheads | Plutonium Stockpile |
|---|---|---|
| India | 130–210 | ~680 kg (weapons-grade) |
| Pakistan | ~200 (projected by late 2020s) | Rapidly expanding plutonium & uranium enrichment |
Source: Federation of American Scientists, International Panel on Fissile Materials
Diplomacy & Deterrence: Still Holding the Line
Despite fiery rhetoric, both governments have avoided direct nuclear confrontation. According to Sumit Ganguly of Stanford University:
“Neither India nor Pakistan wants to be the first violator of the post-Hiroshima nuclear taboo.”
Retaliation would be devastating, and both nations are aware of the global and human cost.
The Bottom Line
Is a nuclear war likely? No. Is it possible? Unfortunately, yes.
While the risk remains relatively low, the presence of nuclear weapons ensures that every crisis carries an undercurrent of catastrophic danger. Most military actions are calculated to avoid pushing red lines. But with rising nationalism, growing arsenals, and unpredictable geopolitical shifts, even a small miscalculation can spiral into tragedy.
“Even a small risk is too large when nuclear weapons are involved,” cautions John Erath, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation.