Introduction
The Supreme Court strongly criticised NCERT over content in a newly introduced Class 8 social science textbook. The chapter, titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society,” reportedly discussed:
- Corruption in the judiciary
- Heavy backlog of cases
- Inadequate number of judges
During the hearing, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant described the inclusion of such content as a “deep-rooted and well-planned conspiracy to defame the judiciary.”
What Did the Supreme Court Say?
The Court issued sharp remarks over two consecutive days:
- It issued a show-cause notice to the NCERT Director and the School Education Secretary.
- It asked why action should not be initiated over the textbook content.
- The CJI observed that there was “not a single word of apology” in NCERT’s communication.
- The Court called for a “deeper probe” into how the chapter was approved.
The bench also warned that strict action could follow if its directions regarding a ban or withdrawal of the book were not followed.
What Was the Government’s Response?
Appearing for the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta tendered an “unconditional and unqualified apology” on behalf of the education ministry.
Following the Court’s criticism:
- NCERT announced that it would withdraw the revised textbook.
- Distribution of the book was put on hold.
- Retrieval of the limited number of copies already sold was initiated.
- NCERT described the issue as an “error of judgment” and said the material was flagged both internally and by the Department of School Education and Literacy.
Why Is This Significant?
Sensitivity Around Judiciary Representation
The judiciary is a constitutional pillar, and any representation in educational materials is expected to be carefully balanced and factually grounded.
Separation of Powers
The episode highlights tensions that can arise between the judiciary and executive bodies over institutional portrayal.
Educational Content Oversight
The controversy raises broader questions about:
- Review mechanisms within NCERT
- Editorial safeguards in textbook development
- Government oversight of academic materials
What Happens Next?
The Supreme Court has indicated the possibility of:
- Further scrutiny of the textbook approval process
- Accountability proceedings against responsible officials
- Continued monitoring of compliance with court directions
The matter could also influence future textbook drafting guidelines and review processes.
Factcheck India Conclusion
This episode underscores:
- The judiciary’s strong stance on protecting institutional credibility
- The sensitivity of curriculum content relating to constitutional bodies
- The importance of editorial checks in educational publishing
As proceedings continue, further clarity is expected on accountability and textbook policy reforms.