TRUTH DEFENDERS OF INDIA

Explainer

Pegasus Spyware: SC Says It’s Not Illegal — But Misuse? That’s Another Story

ByFactcheck India

April 29, 2025 #disinformation, #Fact Check India, #Factcheck_in, #FactCheckIndia, #Fake news, #fakecheck, #India, #misinformation, #social media,#TruthXIndia
SC on Pegasus Spyware: Legal Use, But Misuse ConcernsPegasus is no ordinary software. It’s a powerful surveillance tool developed by Israeli firm NSO Group — capable of infiltrating smartphones, stealing messages, and even activating cameras and microphones — without the user ever knowing.

Is the government watching us? That’s the question rattling India ever since the word “Pegasus” entered public conversations. And now, the Supreme Court has weighed in — not to ban the spyware, but to question how it’s being used.

What Is Pegasus, and Why Is It a Big Deal?

Pegasus is no ordinary software. It’s a powerful surveillance tool developed by Israeli firm NSO Group — capable of infiltrating smartphones, stealing messages, and even activating cameras and microphones — without the user ever knowing.

In 2021, a media exposé rocked India, alleging that the spyware may have been used to target over 40 journalists, activists, politicians, and even judges. Among the names? Rahul Gandhi, former CBI Director Alok Verma, and several prominent journalists.

What Did the Supreme Court Say?

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court said something striking: owning spyware for national security isn’t illegal. But there’s a catch — misusing it against private individuals is a serious concern.

“To have a spyware, nothing wrong… We cannot sacrifice national security. But yes, private individuals must be protected under the Constitution,” said Justice Surya Kant.

The court emphasized that national security doesn’t mean unchecked spying — and judicial review cannot be thrown out just because the government says “it’s classified.”

What About the Investigation?

In 2021, the court had set up a three-member technical committee, headed by former SC judge R.V. Raveendran, to dig into the Pegasus allegations. The findings?

  • Out of 29 devices examined, malware was found in five, but not definitively identified as Pegasus.
  • The government did not cooperate with the probe.

Now, the court is considering whether parts of that report can be released — but it’s cautious. Anything touching “national security” will not be made public, though individuals might be told if they were targeted.

Who Said What?

  • Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: “Terrorists cannot claim privacy rights.”
  • Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal: “Citizens must know what the government is doing. Even a redacted report is necessary.”
  • Senior Advocate Shyam Divan: “The state used spyware against its own people. This is proven.”

Why It Matters

This is more than a legal battle. It’s about how much power a government should have to watch its own citizens — and what checks should exist to prevent misuse.

In a world where your phone can be turned against you, privacy isn’t just a luxury — it’s a right.

By Factcheck India

Related Post

Explainer

Explainer: Why Did Delhi’s Major Air Quality Monitoring Stations Stop Showing Data on Diwali Evening?

November 9, 2026 Factcheck India
Explainer

Allahabad High Court’s Warning to Young Lawyers: What Is Behind the Bar-Bench Tensions?

November 4, 2026 Factcheck India
Explainer

Explainer: How Can Israel Break Its Election Deadlock?

October 31, 2026 Factcheck India
130 thoughts on “Pegasus Spyware: SC Says It’s Not Illegal — But Misuse? That’s Another Story”

  1. Die Veröffentlichung in der Fachzeitschrift Nature Anfang 1997 löste weltweite Schockwellen aus.
    Gleichzeitig setzen Forschende die Technik im Artenschutz ein, etwa um bedrohte Arten zu erhalten oder genetische Vielfalt zu sichern. Somit wurde keine hundertprozentige genetische Übereinstimmung mit dem
    Ausgangstier erreicht.

    References:
    s3.amazonaws.com

    Reply

  112. Thanks on your marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.
    I will be sure to bookmark your blog and may come back at some point.

    I want to encourage you to continue your great writing,
    have a nice weekend!

    Reply

  114. Roobet needs 1 confirmation for Bitcoin and 3 for Ethereum, Tether or USDC before a payout counts as received. A crypto withdrawal goes to a wallet address and can’t be recalled, so copy the address and choose the right network every time. Hollywoodbets won’t approve a first withdrawal until your FICA documents are approved. If a payout goes wrong, iGaming Ontario will review a dispute once you’ve tried to settle it with the operator. The reviews can be slower than at a licensed casino. Verify, meet the playthrough, hit the minimum and choose bank https://moveblockchain.org/en/forum/topic/how-legit-is-best-bank-transfer-pokies-australia/ or a gift card.

    Reply

  122. Usually, these sites let you play pokies with PayID deposit, as most sign up bonuses require a deposit to unlock the match deposit or free spins. A free spins bonus comes in handy if you want to play online pokies with Pay ID. These offers are more common at Australian-facing casinos, but Kiwi players may also find free no deposit bonus NZ offers at PayID-friendly sites. The bonus can come in the shape of free spins or a small sum of bonus funds. As the name implies, a no deposit bonus requires no deposit whatsoever. If you want to play the best games, you will be pleased to learn that you can get something a little extra with your online pokies PayID deposit.

    References: https://clubelectronicos.com/foro-electronica/topic/payid-casinos-2026-fastest-withdrawals-tested-0-2h-payouts/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You missed

Explainer

Explainer: Why Did Delhi’s Major Air Quality Monitoring Stations Stop Showing Data on Diwali Evening?

November 9, 2026 Factcheck India
Fact Check

Fact Check: Did Russian Minister Mock S Jaishankar Over India-China Border Dispute?

November 7, 2026 Factcheck India
Explainer

Allahabad High Court’s Warning to Young Lawyers: What Is Behind the Bar-Bench Tensions?

November 4, 2026 Factcheck India
Fact Check

Fact Check: Cyclone Murasu Makes Landfall in Andhra Pradesh

November 3, 2026 Factcheck India
error: Content is protected !!