Claim

Several social media posts and protest groups claim that the Indian government’s new labour law overhaul weakens workers’ rights.

Verdict

Partly True

Fact Check Summary

India has indeed implemented four new labour codes that replace 29 central labour laws. These reforms are real—but the claims of “rights rollback” are partly true and partly misleading.
While the codes simplify compliance, expand social security, and formally recognise gig workers, they also increase employer flexibility on layoffs and introduce new restrictions on strikes, which has triggered worry among trade unions.

India has indeed implemented four new labour codes that replace 29 central labour laws. These reforms are real—but the claims of “rights rollback” are partly true and partly misleading.
While the codes simplify compliance, expand social security, and formally recognise gig workers, they also increase employer flexibility on layoffs and introduce new restrictions on strikes, which has triggered worry among trade unions.

What Has the Government Changed?

1. Consolidation of 29 Labour Laws Into 4 Codes

India has reduced:

• 1,400+ labour rules → ~350,
• 180 compliance forms → 73,
  with the aim of reducing red tape and easing business operations.

The four codes are:

• Code on Wages
• Code on Social Security
• Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (OSH) Code
• Industrial Relations (IR) Code

These laws received parliamentary approval in 2020 but delayed implementation due to state-level coordination issues.

What Workers Are Concerned About

1. Easier Layoffs for Medium-Sized Factories

Earlier rule:
Factories with 100+ workers needed government permission to fire or retrench employees.

New rule:
The threshold has been raised to 300 workers.

Trade unions argue this excludes a large section of workers from legal protections.

2. Stricter Rules for Strikes

Workers must now give a 14-day notice before striking.
Previously, this applied only to government-run establishments.

Unions say this weakens collective bargaining power.

What the Government Says

The Centre argues that:

• India’s labour laws were outdated and overly complex.
• Modernising them helps attract foreign investment.
• The new framework expands worker protections—including gig workers—for the first time.
• Mandatory appointment letters, uniform minimum wages, annual health check-ups, and gender-neutral pay structures strengthen worker safety.

Economists like Arvind Panagariya argue that rigid laws earlier discouraged manufacturing scale and global competitiveness.

Expert Opinions: Mixed Response

Supportive Economists Say:

• India needs flexible labour markets to compete with Vietnam and China.
• The eased rules could encourage larger factories and more jobs.
• The old laws were contradictory and difficult to comply with.

Critical Economists Say:

• India’s industrial stagnation stems from low wages and weak demand, not labour rules.
• Reducing protections when unemployment is high can worsen worker vulnerability.
• Tech-led displacement makes strong worker safeguards more important.

Impact on Companies

HR and compliance experts say that companies must prepare for:

• New wage structures
• Revised HR systems
• Updated social security contributions
• Dual compliance with both central and state rules during the transition period

Industry groups have welcomed the reform as a long-pending move that will ease regulatory pressure.

So, Are Workers’ Rights Being Rolled Back?

Verdict: Partly True

The new labour codes bring much-needed simplification, modernisation, and some improved protections.
But they also:

• Allow easier layoffs in factories with fewer than 300 workers.
• Place stricter conditions on striking, reducing bargaining power.

Thus, the claim of “rights rollback” is not fully accurate, but the concern about reduced worker protection in certain areas is valid.

Conclusion

India’s sweeping labour reforms represent one of the biggest legal overhauls in decades.
While the government positions it as a pro-business, pro-growth move, trade unions argue it dilutes hard-won protections for millions of workers.
The truth lies in the middle: the reforms introduce valuable modernisation but also shift the balance of power slightly towards employers. The real impact—on jobs, wages, and investment—will unfold only after nationwide implementation and state-level alignment.